<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 SEO Don&#8217;ts For Your Personal Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.brand-yourself.com/2009/11/24/5-seo-donts-for-your-personal-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.brand-yourself.com/2009/11/24/5-seo-donts-for-your-personal-website/</link>
	<description>Tips to become more hirable, strengthen your personal brand and build a remarkable web presence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:47:20 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jordyrsc</title>
		<link>http://blog.brand-yourself.com/2009/11/24/5-seo-donts-for-your-personal-website/comment-page-1/#comment-6237</link>
		<dc:creator>jordyrsc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brand-yourself.com/?p=4750#comment-6237</guid>
		<description>With regard to links, doesn&#039;t google also recognize &quot;hub and spoke&quot; type websites, those which actually link out constantly but provide a secure hub for people to find quality content elsewhere. I&#039;m picturing sites like Alltop etc. I don&#039;t really have the time to quote relevant articles right now, but I&#039;m sure such a thing exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regard to links, doesn&#39;t google also recognize &#8220;hub and spoke&#8221; type websites, those which actually link out constantly but provide a secure hub for people to find quality content elsewhere. I&#39;m picturing sites like Alltop etc. I don&#39;t really have the time to quote relevant articles right now, but I&#39;m sure such a thing exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jordyrsc</title>
		<link>http://blog.brand-yourself.com/2009/11/24/5-seo-donts-for-your-personal-website/comment-page-1/#comment-6114</link>
		<dc:creator>jordyrsc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brand-yourself.com/?p=4750#comment-6114</guid>
		<description>With regard to links, doesn&#039;t google also recognize &quot;hub and spoke&quot; type websites, those which actually link out constantly but provide a secure hub for people to find quality content elsewhere. I&#039;m picturing sites like Alltop etc. I don&#039;t really have the time to quote relevant articles right now, but I&#039;m sure such a thing exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regard to links, doesn&#39;t google also recognize &#8220;hub and spoke&#8221; type websites, those which actually link out constantly but provide a secure hub for people to find quality content elsewhere. I&#39;m picturing sites like Alltop etc. I don&#39;t really have the time to quote relevant articles right now, but I&#39;m sure such a thing exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ Sherman</title>
		<link>http://blog.brand-yourself.com/2009/11/24/5-seo-donts-for-your-personal-website/comment-page-1/#comment-6024</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ Sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brand-yourself.com/?p=4750#comment-6024</guid>
		<description>Ray – Thanks for your comment.  We appreciate people getting involved and would love to hear more from our readership.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Concerning duplicate content I agree that porting news from another site may have some good implications but on a personal website where individuals are producing content about themselves I am encouraging them to produce original content across a limited number of sites.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Once again on the link comment, I am sure that a site with a better page rank having links will not hurt you as much.  To reference Matt Cutts in his June 15 article on page rank sculpting, outbound links play a role in determining PageRank.  Having 5000 outbound links is a really relative number.  If you have 10,000 pages with 5,000 total links and all of them have rel=nofollow then your outbound linking isn’t affecting you.  As Matt Cutts states “Nofollow links definitely don’t pass PageRank.”  You risk of passing along page rank as Matt Cutts also states, “Google trusts sites less when they link to spammy sites or bad neighborhoods” so when you do link you want to make sure it is a good deliberate link.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Search engines cannot read images very well as stated in Matt Cutt’s video: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NbuDpB_BTc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NbuDpB_BTc&lt;/a&gt; but they can read very well what is around an image.  Google does not look at the image and do optical recognition of the image.  Instead it does contextual reasoning to determine the nature of the image.  Of course Google looks at alt tags, titles, file names, text around the image.  Once again I geared the article towards a person building a site for the first time.  You are correct in stating that Google is weary of load times.  For an individual that is creating a website for their first time, I am encouraging them to go lighter on the images because after years of watching how people build sites for their first time, they are not sophisticated in the ways of making sure they are optimized for the web, they have the correct supporting code in the way of alt tags, title tags and good file names.  As I stated in the above item concerning all images, no content that a person should have text around their images.  Once again someone just starting out is most likely not going to have all of the components needed to make an all image page search engine friendly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree completely that SEO is very complex, search engines are constantly on a quest to differentiate between good content and content that will not help their users.  You hallways have to keep in mind that search engines are businesses, and their customers are people that search every day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray – Thanks for your comment.  We appreciate people getting involved and would love to hear more from our readership.</p>
<p>Concerning duplicate content I agree that porting news from another site may have some good implications but on a personal website where individuals are producing content about themselves I am encouraging them to produce original content across a limited number of sites.  </p>
<p>Once again on the link comment, I am sure that a site with a better page rank having links will not hurt you as much.  To reference Matt Cutts in his June 15 article on page rank sculpting, outbound links play a role in determining PageRank.  Having 5000 outbound links is a really relative number.  If you have 10,000 pages with 5,000 total links and all of them have rel=nofollow then your outbound linking isn’t affecting you.  As Matt Cutts states “Nofollow links definitely don’t pass PageRank.”  You risk of passing along page rank as Matt Cutts also states, “Google trusts sites less when they link to spammy sites or bad neighborhoods” so when you do link you want to make sure it is a good deliberate link.</p>
<p>Search engines cannot read images very well as stated in Matt Cutt’s video: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NbuDpB_BTc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NbuDpB_BTc</a> but they can read very well what is around an image.  Google does not look at the image and do optical recognition of the image.  Instead it does contextual reasoning to determine the nature of the image.  Of course Google looks at alt tags, titles, file names, text around the image.  Once again I geared the article towards a person building a site for the first time.  You are correct in stating that Google is weary of load times.  For an individual that is creating a website for their first time, I am encouraging them to go lighter on the images because after years of watching how people build sites for their first time, they are not sophisticated in the ways of making sure they are optimized for the web, they have the correct supporting code in the way of alt tags, title tags and good file names.  As I stated in the above item concerning all images, no content that a person should have text around their images.  Once again someone just starting out is most likely not going to have all of the components needed to make an all image page search engine friendly.</p>
<p>I agree completely that SEO is very complex, search engines are constantly on a quest to differentiate between good content and content that will not help their users.  You hallways have to keep in mind that search engines are businesses, and their customers are people that search every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://blog.brand-yourself.com/2009/11/24/5-seo-donts-for-your-personal-website/comment-page-1/#comment-6023</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brand-yourself.com/?p=4750#comment-6023</guid>
		<description>As a SEO, I have to point to a couple things wrong with the post;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  Paraphrased from Matt Cutts - It isn&#039;t that Google thinks duplicate content is merely spam, but, Google, for the most part, can tell when the content was put up on the web.  So, if your website posts an article and another website scrapes the content and puts it up, you&#039;re website will most likely get the higher ranking because it was on the net first. ---- It&#039;s not always the case that you are spamming and filling your content with duplicate content, there are some legit reasons to have duplicate content on your site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  Too many links - This is just wrong, sort of.  What&#039;s the definition of too many links?  I can have a website with 5000 links point to external websites and it won&#039;t harm its rankings a bit.  Also, you specifically say &#039;rankings&#039; which is too general, it doesn&#039;t have much of a meaning; what rankings?  which rankings?  for what phrases?  &quot;Too Many&quot; links will not hurt you, if they are links with purpose.  Linking to spam identified sites and neighborhoods will hurt you.  But that doesn&#039;t mean too many links will hurt you, 1 link can hurt you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  All Images, No Content - Again, wrong reasoning.  Images do help your SEO, Search Engines CAN read your images, through their ALT tag.  Great content with 100 images won&#039;t hurt your SEO.  100 images that makes your page slow to load will hurt your SEO, but for a lot of different reasons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  SEO is a complicated topic, but I don&#039;t want generalizations to taint the minds of those looking towards SEO and see things like this, it&#039;s more complicated than the above, more working pieces.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  SEO can be extremely rewarding, don&#039;t bang your head vvv little tweaks can have a big impact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a SEO, I have to point to a couple things wrong with the post;</p>
<p>  Paraphrased from Matt Cutts &#8211; It isn&#39;t that Google thinks duplicate content is merely spam, but, Google, for the most part, can tell when the content was put up on the web.  So, if your website posts an article and another website scrapes the content and puts it up, you&#39;re website will most likely get the higher ranking because it was on the net first. &#8212;- It&#39;s not always the case that you are spamming and filling your content with duplicate content, there are some legit reasons to have duplicate content on your site.</p>
<p>  Too many links &#8211; This is just wrong, sort of.  What&#39;s the definition of too many links?  I can have a website with 5000 links point to external websites and it won&#39;t harm its rankings a bit.  Also, you specifically say &#39;rankings&#39; which is too general, it doesn&#39;t have much of a meaning; what rankings?  which rankings?  for what phrases?  &#8220;Too Many&#8221; links will not hurt you, if they are links with purpose.  Linking to spam identified sites and neighborhoods will hurt you.  But that doesn&#39;t mean too many links will hurt you, 1 link can hurt you.</p>
<p>  All Images, No Content &#8211; Again, wrong reasoning.  Images do help your SEO, Search Engines CAN read your images, through their ALT tag.  Great content with 100 images won&#39;t hurt your SEO.  100 images that makes your page slow to load will hurt your SEO, but for a lot of different reasons.</p>
<p>  SEO is a complicated topic, but I don&#39;t want generalizations to taint the minds of those looking towards SEO and see things like this, it&#39;s more complicated than the above, more working pieces.</p>
<p>  SEO can be extremely rewarding, don&#39;t bang your head vvv little tweaks can have a big impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://blog.brand-yourself.com/2009/11/24/5-seo-donts-for-your-personal-website/comment-page-1/#comment-6021</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brand-yourself.com/?p=4750#comment-6021</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brandyourself: 5 SEO Don&#039;ts For Your Personal Website http://su.pr/9oTi1U Make sure not to do this!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brandyourself: 5 SEO Don&#8217;ts For Your Personal Website <a href="http://su.pr/9oTi1U" rel="nofollow">http://su.pr/9oTi1U</a> Make sure not to do this!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention 5 SEO Don'ts for your personal website &#124; Brand-Yourself.com Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.brand-yourself.com/2009/11/24/5-seo-donts-for-your-personal-website/comment-page-1/#comment-6020</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention 5 SEO Don'ts for your personal website &#124; Brand-Yourself.com Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brand-yourself.com/?p=4750#comment-6020</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brand-Yourself and Driven Magazine, Pete Kistler. Pete Kistler said: 5 SEO Don’ts For Your Personal Website http://bit.ly/5KD8Xj [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brand-Yourself and Driven Magazine, Pete Kistler. Pete Kistler said: 5 SEO Don’ts For Your Personal Website <a href="http://bit.ly/5KD8Xj" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5KD8Xj</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.brand-yourself.com/2009/11/24/5-seo-donts-for-your-personal-website/comment-page-1/#comment-6022</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brand-yourself.com/?p=4750#comment-6022</guid>
		<description>This is why SEO can drive a man to drink..lol&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You do to little, no good.  You do to much..no good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You have to find that middle ground with all the SEO tactics. I&#039;m still looking :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why SEO can drive a man to drink..lol</p>
<p>You do to little, no good.  You do to much..no good.</p>
<p>You have to find that middle ground with all the SEO tactics. I&#39;m still looking <img src='http://blog.brand-yourself.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
